See this? Looks like home, doesn't it? And sometimes it feels like we are the only country struggling with these issues of immigration. But guess what. This poster isn't from Arizona, or Florida, it's part of a sign on a wall on Ermou Street in downtown Athens.
It's not the only one, either. The country is under terrible economic pressure and it's fraying things.
According to our very sweet taxi driver, despite the rumors of wild spending on services, Greece does not provide for the homeless or the poor - at least not enough. And the people coming into Greece want jobs and "a better life" but "they aren't taking any food from me!" He's with the marcher s- but there are plenty on the other side too. We know it's true in France and Germany -- and that Mohamed is one of the most frequent names for new babies in many European countries. But as you can see the sympathy hasn't completely eroded.
In addition to these posters, there are many stencils, borrowed from Paris, look like the one below, also from a wall in our neighborhood here.
For more evidence of how bad things are -- look at this sure coal mine canary: Squeegee men vintage NYC in the 1980's - all over town.
I'll keep you posted as we move through the islands - assuming things will be different there. Would write more but it costs the earth to use the web on this "yacht."
It was a fairy tale about a princess on a journey. Doing her duty, kind of like Diana (but, since she was played by Audrey Hepburn, even classier,) she came to Rome, after Athens, London and Paris, to conclude her mission.
But she was young and beautiful and sick of receptions and parades. And so, in the middle of the night, she snuck out the embassy window and ventured across the Piazza di Spagna and into the Roman night.
If you know this movie at all, you remember with sweet nostalgia the way you felt the first time you saw it. The princess asleep near the Trevi Fountain on the Roman equivalent of a park bench is awakened, like Sleeping Beauty, by reporter Joe Bradley, played by Gregory Peck. ( If the film has a flaw, it's that we know some of what will happen once we see him there. He's a good guy and that's who he plays. He isAtticus Finch, after all.)
The film was released in 1953, right in the middle of the 1950's. Written by Dalton Trumbo, "Roman Holiday" was credited to a "front" named Ian McLellan Hunter, because Trumbo, blacklisted as a member of the Hollywood Ten, wasn't permitted to write for movies any longer. It's one of the darkest chapters in Hollywood history, very much a part of the image of the decade and a sad facet of a beloved film that won three Oscars and introduced the world to Audrey Hepburn.
There's something else though. The people in this film behave well. There are things that they want, desperately, but there are principals at stake, and they honor them. When Peck meets Hepburn, he doesn't recognize her but lets her crash at his apartment. Once he figures out who she is, he knows this "runaway" could be the story of his life. Even so, after a brief, idyllic tour of the city, (SPOILER ALERT) she honors her responsibilities and returns to her royal duties, and of course, he never writes the story. It was very much an artifact of the
"Greatest Generation" ideals, manifested with such courage during
WWII and very much the flip side of the jaundiced (and just as accurate) Mad Men view of the 50's. Duty and honor trump romance and ambition.
Once again, I'm struck with admiration for the people of these times. Yes the 50's did terrible damage and made it difficult to be eccentric or rebellious or even creative. But films like this one, or Now Voyagerand similar films of the 40's, sentimental as they may be, remind us of what else these people were. They'd lived through the Depression and the war and they had an elevated sense of responsibility. As we watch much of our government (and some of the rest of us) disintegrate into partisanship and self-interest, it makes a lot more sense than it did when we rose up against it all in the 1960's. Doesn't it?
That old rascal Samuel Johnson told us that when we were tired of London, we'd be tired of life.
I know it's summer when any city is inviting but this week is cool and
bright and breezy and London is full of British school groups and kids
from everywhere else too, and we have an apartment right in the middle
of Covent Garden (well NOT the market, God forbid, just the
neighborhood) and our older son and his new wife are only 40 minutes
away and we have friends here, too. So how could we be tired?
What you see here is the view from Waterloo Bridge (and yes that's St. Paul's Cathedral in the background.) This morning I went out and walked all along the Embankment, over where the trees are, then crossed a bridge just out of view on the right and returned via South Bank,
London's wonderful (relatively) new arts and museum area. My entire
walk was around three miles and I'm realizing that it's much easier to
do the walking when there are new things to look at, not just the old
neighborhood or, as lovely as it is, Rock Creek Park.
The
wonder of a great city is that it's always changing, that even the most
trivial journey is full of surprises. On my way home tonight I came
across a group of teenagers - one of dozens of g The
wonder of a great city is that it's always changing, that even the most
trivial journey is full of surprises. On my way home tonight I came
across a group of teenagers - one of dozens of groups we've been seeing
ever since we got here. The reason they're all sitting on the sidewalk
is that they're exchanging addresses and spelling them out - different
nationalities, different spelling. Kind of an EU photo.
Of
course there's lots else going on here. Huge waves of immigration, the
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, what looks to me to be an appalling
amount of youthful alcohol consumption
and unemployment all take their toll. There's something about the
place despite those issues though. The day after the 2005 subway bombing that killed 52 people, Londoners got back on the train and went to work. They did that all during the Blitz as much of the rest of the world watched them face down Hitler almost alone.
Cities
are supposed to change. That's what makes them exciting. Even so,
London has seen more than its share: waves of immigration that have
transformed it, an early history of wars and fires and plagues,
contemporary royal scandals and of course the "troubles" between
Belfast and the rest of Ireland and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
After all, who would have believed before it arrived to help celebrate
the Millennium, that there would be a ferris wheel right in the center
of town? They call it the London Eye to
make it sound fancy but it's still a ferris wheel, here in same town
that has a real live queen living in a real live palace? It's pretty
amazing.
I'm
thinking that while we're here I can try to get past some of what I've
written here and learn a bit of what it's like to truly live
here. It's got to be different from wandering around with no need to
be on time or face the traffic or crowded mass transit and infinite
numbers of tourists and, incidentally, deal with what appears to be an
enormous amount of alcohol consumption - especially by men. I'm hoping
to keep you posted as I make my way. I hope you'll come along.
It's very hard to be married. This is no headline.
But the Sunday New York Times on December 13th carried a piece by David
Sarasohn; a meditation on marriage, moving from the first
lines: "I have been married forever. Well, not since the
Big Bang but since the Nixon administration — 35 years — a stretch long enough
to startle new acquaintances or make talk-show audiences applaud" to
the last.
As you may deduce from the hair, we too married during the
Nixon years, and we too are still together. We were married on September 12,
1971 and have survived more than 38 years of complicated marriage about which
I've written before. So why now?
Well, first of all because my husband asked me to write
it. Just to see what came out, I think. How did we do
it? How are we still doing it? Oh - and why have we bothered?
We've seen friends split over much less than what we've faced, so what was
different?
Here's Mr. Sarasohn's theory:
I am somewhat better with words than my wife is; she is
infinitely better with people. In different ways, we translate each other to
the rest of the world, and admire each other’s contrasting language skills.
Being married to someone you respect for being somehow better than you keeps
affection alive. That this impressive person chooses you year after year makes
you more pleased with yourself, fueling the kind of mutual self-esteem that can
get you through decades.
Not bad.I know we've been all over the world and
I would never have had the nerve with out him; he is the one who was probably
an airplane in a previous life. And that we met an extraordinary number
of wonderful people because of the work he chose to do. And that he
pushed me to write my book and never expected me to be anything but a working
mom. And among psychoanalysts in Manhattan in the 70s and 80s that was
pretty amazing. OH and he shoved and pushed and pulled me to spend money
on myself once in a while, which was very hard for a girl from a
Depression-scarred background. I know he's got his own list for me as well.
Of course we've faced plenty of though stuff too. His chronic illness is
a rotten burden and one that has colored much of our time together. And
we've had professional and financial crises, and moved from Washington to Palo
Alto to New York to another apartment in New York to Los Angeles to another house
in Los Angeles to Washington and another house in Washington.We've
had some challenges as parents and as partners, other health issues including open-heart
surgery, loss of our parents and very tough moments even now. But leaving
- that was never an option. We have many young friends who wonder at the
fact that we are still together and it's one of the few times I feel a distance
from them. I'm so aware that it's something you know more than you say, despite the beauty
and wisdom of the Sarasohn piece and despite my efforts here.
Once my dad told me that he was sure we'd never be divorced; we
were both too stubborn. I guess that's true too, but it takes more than
that. We are never ever bored with each other. We share basic
values that we've been able to pass on to our kids even though we may have
differed on the details. We trust each other. We have fun - and
now, day-by-day, we share a history.
A collected set of joint memories is not a small thing. I
always say it's like quitting smoking - every day you accumulate increases the
value of the commitment. Just this morning, listening to the blizzard
weather predictions, I recalled an orange outfit we had bought our toddler in
Paris more than thirty years ago. "
Remember the orange snowsuit we bought Josh in au Printemps?" I asked him. He smiled in fond recollection and said
"Yeah, but it was Galeries Lafayette." There are a
lifetime of those moments.
That was, by the way, the same trip where Josh
stared up at the Winged Victory of Samothrace towering at the
top of the main staircase in the Louvre and said "pigeon."
I'm telling you these small memories for a reason. The
big things are cool too - watching a son get married, fancy parties with
high-profile people, trips around the country and around the world. But
within and surrounding the gigantic are those moments that make a marriage,
tiny and still; a quiet loving word from a son, or the sharing of a meal he has
prepared, the deck of a beach house while the sun goes down, wonder at a great
performance or a great meal shared. For the two of us, 38 years of those trump the
aggravation and the stressful moments.
Frighteningly, I'm about to turn the age I always thought a
subject for humor - after all, there is even a song.
When I get older, losing my hair,
Many years from now.
Will you still be sending me a valentine
Birthday greetings bottle of wine?
If I'd been out till quarter to three
Would you lock the door?
Will you still need me, will you still feed me,
When I'm sixty-four.
We knew each other when this song was
still part of FM rotation – when we counted our ages in fewer than half those years.Between then and now, more has happened
than I can describe – both in the “outside world” and in our home. And I know the answer to the question. Yes - from me and from him. When we're sixty-four and, God willng, long after that.
When you're nineteen or twenty and living in a college dorm in western Massachusetts life is beautiful. Especially in the morning. There's something about a New England morning that feels like a new beginning. If you're in the country, that's even more true.
So today, when I received my "Happy Mountain Day" message, I found myself hurtling back to those mornings- once a year - when the fall foliage was at its best and mid-terms were coming, when we'd awaken to the sound of bells and know it was Mountain Day. Classes were canceled, box lunches were waiting in the dorm dining rooms, and the day was ours. The idea was that we take our bicycles or the bus or someone's car and go see what a New England autumn was all about.
Smith College was way before its time in many ways: educating women, educating the whole person (maintaining a healthy body AND a healthy mind), advocating for an equal role for all of us. It's no accident that Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan along with Julia Child, Molly Ivins, Jane Harman, Madeleine l'Engle and hundreds of other remarkable women studied there.
You didn't teach at Smith to get famous or publish best-sellers. University professors got the attention, even though those who taught us were certainly as knowledgeable. Somehow though, people who taught "girls" were considered lesser beings. Of course there were rewards: eager, grateful students who reveled in learning and arguing and growing toward success, students who returned to say thank-you, and a lovely, civilized environment. When we wanted to start an African-American studies curriculum, we just found a professor who was willing to supervise us, and we had one. Faculty members were expected to come to dinner when they were invited, and eat with a table of curious underclasswomen. We spent enormous amounts of time hanging around with professors, and one another, figuring out everything from the meaning of pacifism to the puzzles that were Stan Brakhage films.
As women, we formed a sisterhood that lasts. Meet another "Smithie" and there's a bond - a grateful understanding of what we've shared. I know that happens in lots of schools, but women's colleges have a special understanding - because we made a choice to study with one another in a specific environment that enriched and strengthened us.
And Mountain Day? Well, think about it. Seasons, beauty, nature, a sense of priorities, self-education, fun, friendship. All enhanced by ringing bells, box lunches and the oranges, reds and yellows of a New England fall. Reminding all the ambitious, capable and very busy women who came to and left to remember, as they moved forward, to ring the bell once in a while, go outside and look at the leaves.
This bench sits along the Thames, on the South Bank, between Waterloo and BlackFriars Bridges. It's a nice bench. Since we leave London tomorrow I had my last walk along the river today. And it gave me a gift.
I walked around it, to sit down and say goodbye to the river, the bridges and London - found this:
It's been a lovely time. We fly in the morning. See you on the other side.
In the early 20th Century there was a band of wild men who created an entire new way of thinking about "Art." They were called Futurists and for those of you who took Art 11 and already know about them, I understand that I didn't discover them - this being particularly true since they are currently appearing in a retrospective at the Tate Modern here in London. AND for my penultimate (I think) post here I want to tell you about them because they were a real kick.
This painting, by Luigi Russolo, is called "The Revolt." On the right you can see "the people" pushing up against the hard line of the establishment. It's the same thing the Futurists themselves were doing. Here's their major "Manifesto."
With our enthusiastic adherence to Futurism, we will:
Destroy the cult of the past, the obsession with the ancients, pedantry and academic formalism.
Totally invalidate all kinds of imitation.
Elevate all attempts at originality, however daring, however violent.
Bear bravely and proudly the smear of “madness” with which they try to gag all innovators.
Regard art critics as useless and dangerous.
Rebel against the tyranny of words: “Harmony” and “good taste” and other loose expressions which can be used to destroy the works of Rembrandt, Goya, Rodin...
Sweep the whole field of art clean of all themes and subjects which have been used in the past.
Support and glory in our day-to-day world, a world which is going to be continually and splendidly transformed by victorious Science.
The dead shall be buried in the earth’s deepest bowels! The threshold of the future will be swept free of mummies! Make room for youth, for violence, for daring!
As I wandered through, alone and more available for being by myself, (this one is Carra's The Funeral of an Anarchist) I felt that I knew these guys. Yes they denigrated women (more on that in a second) but their rebellion, their anger, their passion, their desire to change everything - that was familiar. Of course I never wanted to destroy; none of us did. But the feelings of anger, of disappointment in the ways of the world, the desire to find new ways to say things, those were familiar -- and swept me back to the determined, impassioned girl I was then. I can only describe my reaction as delight.
You're going to tell me that this is the kind of blind passion is just what was wrong with the 60's. And for those who transformed these feelings not into art but into primitive acts of violence - they were wrong then and they're wrong now. That's what is so amazing about art. You can act, and express, through representation instead of concrete acts of violence and hatred. That's what these enraged men did. Meanwhile, the women artists were pretty angry, as you can imagine. One of them, Valentine de Saint-Point, although she agreed with their ideas, had some of her own to go along with them. Like this:
"Women
are Furies, Amazons, Semiramis, Joans of Arc, Jeanne Hachettes, Judith
and Charlotte Cordays, Cleopatras, and Messalinas: combative women who
fight more ferociously than males, lovers who arouse, destroyers who break down
the weakest and help select through pride or despair, "despair through
which the heart yields its fullest return."
I wish I knew more because there's so much more to this; the impact of Cubism on all
of it, the way it affected artists in nation after nation, and, most of all, the sheer energy of
art that, instead of freezing a moment, seems to set it free and follow it.
I've been to Paris probably close to 15 times in the past 30 years; never has it disappointed me. But until I began living a more Jewishly observant life, I'd missed a huge part of it. Like virtually every other city in Europe, Paris has a "Jewish neighborhood." Like virtually every other city in the world - (if they hadn't been thrown out altogether) the Jews moved out of their old neighborhoods, as they did on the Lower East Side, leaving their stores and delis behind.
This neighborhood in Paris, in the Marais, is somewhere in the middle. Plenty of Jews are still there; plenty more have moved on. But the services, and especially the restaurants, groceries and bookstores -- and several synagogues large and small -- they're still there. This is the bookstore where you can buy prayer books and Jewish history and Shoah books as well as candle sticks and other Jewish necessities. It's not far from a primary school whose front entrance includes a tribute to the more than 100 Jewish children seized there during the German occupation of Paris, never to be seen again. Stand outside that door and you can't help but imagine how it must have looked and sounded and felt that day.
On a lighter note though, since we're Jews, there's food. This is one of two competing falafel stands on Rue de Rosiers and the lines were enormous on this hot, sunny Sunday. In addition to residents and Jewish tourists wandering by, whole tour groups arrived to try the native fare. It was quite festive, actually.
Oh, and there's a photo missing here. I was scared to take it. We were approaching the former home of Jo Goldenberg, the legendary Jewish restaurant in the neighborhood, internationally known even before it was bombed in the summer of 1982, killing six and injuring several others. It's gone now, a victim of the times, but as we neared the empty building, police sirens in the ooh-aah sound European sirens make, blasted us, close by. They screeched to a halt outside and a policeman cautiously approached a bag siting on the stoop outside the former deli. Clearly frightened, he gingerly picked up the bag to put into the police van and move it from the area, now so full of tourists and shoppers. Unnerved, my husband and I sped away.
So you don't get a photo. But I can tell you that the cop looked very scared. And just so you don't think this is a lot of melodrama, I was in a synagogue in Vienna EXACTLY one week before it was bombed. I had my young son in his stroller. That next week, a mother died throwing herself on top of her child - in his stroller. So there's more to hanging around a famous Jewish neighborhood that candlesticks and shwarma.
One more thing. It looks as if, again, like the Lower East Side, gentrification may complete the job that first persecution and then upward mobility began. Last year, a story appeared in AFP - the French wire service, with the headline: "Paris Jewish quarter fights tourism, commerce in battle for soul." Fashion retailers and other high-end businesses want to be in what is now the "cool" neighborhood and let some of that cache rub off on them. The Jews? Well they're fighting to keep their institutions and to remain a distinct community, but there's no guarantee they'll succeed. Until then, the Marais, in addition to great coats, shoes, bags and jewelry, remains the "Jewish neighborhood." So get there while you can.
Ernest Hemingway is pretty passe these days, but in his wonderful memoir of his time in Paris, he wrote something that returns to me every time I'm here "If you are lucky enough to have lived in Paris as a young man, then wherever you go for the rest of your life, it stays with you, for Paris is a movable feast." And so it is. Right here it's going to rain, and the sky is far more grey-blue forbidding than I could get the camera to record, and it's around 4 PM and we've been walking since 10 AM this morning. And we haven't really done anything - not in the way tourists go into museums and enrich themselves. For us these streets, and the Seine, and the beautiful old buildings and boulevards - well, they're the richest of all.
It's pouring rain on the bookstores of Boulevard St. Michel on the Left Bank near the Sorbonne, but that doesn't stop the book shoppers. Paris is a city of readers, one where great writers have been held as heroes and mourned by the city - and much of the entire nation when they died. There are many restaurants and cafes on the Left Bank, which had been home not only to Hemingway and Fitzgerald and Gertrude Stein and Sylvia Beach but also to Simone de Beauvoir and Jean Paul Sartre and so many others. They are crammed with people all the time - whether it's the Deux Magots or the Brasserie Lipp or Cafe de Flore because these places have an enormous literary history and those who visit here know that these are the places to visit even if they've never read The Second Sex or The Sun Also Rises or even The Great Gatsby.
Or maybe they just know, like these two troubadours, that Paris, when you're young, (or, hopefully, any other age) is still a gift. So many have already written better words about the indelible impact of this lovely place; I'm really just here to agree with them.